Deseret News
Android OnlyFree· User Rating
I opened Deseret News expecting a straightforward newspaper app, and that is largely what it is: a focused way to read journalism from Deseret News on an Android phone or tablet. It belongs to the News & Magazines category, comes from Deseret News, and costs nothing to install. My overall impression is that it works best for readers who already value this publication and want its reporting in a cleaner, more convenient mobile format rather than through a browser.
The app has a long history behind it. Deseret News began its mobile presence years ago, with the Android release dating to October 31, 2012, and the current build is version 5.11.0. That combination tells me this is not an abandoned experiment. It is an established reading product that has continued to receive attention, although a mature app also brings a reasonable question: does it still feel current, or is it simply carrying an old idea forward?
How the current Deseret News experience feels
In everyday use, the main advantage is concentration. Instead of opening a general news aggregator and sorting through an endless mixture of publishers, I can use this app when I specifically want Deseret News coverage. That narrower purpose is useful during a quick morning check, a commute, or a few spare minutes before an appointment. The app is not trying to replace every source of information on my phone, and I think it is better understood when judged on that basis.
The publication’s identity is part of the experience. Readers who already recognize the Deseret News voice will probably feel more at home here than someone looking for a completely neutral, multi-source news dashboard. The app gives the publication a direct place on the device, which reduces the friction of repeatedly searching for the site or opening a browser tab.
I also appreciate that the product is accessible to a broad audience. It is rated for Everyone, and the minimum operating system is Android 6.0. That makes it relevant to people who keep an older phone for practical reasons, although compatibility alone does not guarantee that every older device will feel equally quick or comfortable. Screen size, memory, and the general condition of the phone still matter when reading articles for longer periods.
The app’s public reception is encouraging without making it flawless by default. It holds a 4.4 average from around 5.5 thousand ratings, with roughly 1.3 thousand written reviews, and has passed 100 thousand installs. I read those figures as evidence of a real, recurring audience rather than proof that every reader will have the same experience. News apps are especially personal: one user may care about local coverage, another about national reporting, and another about how quickly an article opens.
A practical morning routine
My most natural use case is a short, repeatable routine. I would open the app with coffee, scan the available headlines, read one or two pieces that genuinely matter to me, and close it before the session turns into aimless scrolling. That workflow suits a dedicated publication app better than a broad aggregator when I want a consistent editorial source and do not need ten competing versions of the same story.
There is also a useful distinction between checking news and researching news. For a quick update, the direct route is convenient. If I am investigating a complicated subject, comparing viewpoints, or verifying a claim, I would still move beyond this app and consult additional publications or primary sources. The app can be a starting point, but I would not treat any single newspaper application as a complete information system.
What the version history suggests
The current version, 5.11.0, is the clearest sign of the product’s present state, while the original release date shows how long the Android app has been evolving. I would not confuse a version number with a promise of a particular feature set, but the continued version progression suggests that the developer has maintained the app instead of leaving the original release untouched.
For an existing reader, that matters in a practical way. A maintained app is generally preferable to relying on a very old installation or a browser shortcut that may behave differently over time. Updates can also make the application feel more consistent with newer Android environments. At the same time, an update does not automatically mean a dramatic redesign. Someone expecting a completely different news-reading experience should keep expectations measured.
What I like about this kind of gradual evolution is stability. A newspaper app should let me get to an article without making me relearn the entire interface every few months. The trade-off is that gradual improvement can leave older design habits in place. Readers who prefer highly customizable feeds, aggressive personalization, or a magazine-style visual presentation may find a publication-focused app less flexible than a modern aggregator.
What changes mean for people already using it
If I were already using an earlier build, I would view the move to version 5.11.0 mainly as a reason to stay current, not as a reason to expect a new product category. The core value remains direct access to Deseret News content. Existing users are likely to benefit most from the ordinary advantages of keeping an app maintained: fewer reasons to fall back to the browser and a better chance of fitting comfortably into a current Android setup.
There is a small but important workflow tip here: I would update before deciding that the app is permanently slow or awkward. An old installation can create a misleading impression of the current product. After updating, I would also spend a few minutes checking how headlines, article pages, and navigation feel on my particular phone. A news app can be perfectly acceptable on one device and cramped on another, especially when the reader prefers larger text.
I would also avoid judging the app after only one rushed launch. News applications depend on what is being published at the moment, and a quiet visit may make the product appear less useful than it is during a busy news cycle. My recommendation is to test it over several ordinary days and ask a simple question: does it make reading this publication easier than the browser route I currently use?
Where it fits beside familiar alternatives
Compared with a general news aggregator, Deseret News is more focused and less useful for cross-publication discovery. An aggregator is the better choice when I want many outlets, topic mixing, or a single place to compare headlines. The Deseret News app is the better choice when I want a direct relationship with this one publication and do not want unrelated sources competing for attention.
Compared with reading through a mobile browser, the app offers a more deliberate home for the publication. I do not have to remember the web address or manage another open tab. The browser remains more versatile, though. It is easier to move between publications, use browser-level tools, and keep all reading in one familiar environment. If I only visit Deseret News occasionally, a browser may be enough and installing a separate app may not add much.
Compared with a social media feed, the app should provide a calmer starting point for reading. Social feeds are convenient for discovery, but they also mix reporting with commentary, reposts, and distractions. I prefer a dedicated news app when I want to choose an article based on the publication itself rather than on whichever headline happens to be promoted in a feed.
The key trade-off is focus versus breadth: this app makes sense when Deseret News is the source I intentionally want, not when I expect one application to represent the entire news landscape.
Small habits that improve the experience
One useful habit is to separate headline scanning from serious reading. I would first identify the stories worth my attention, then read them without constantly jumping back to a broader feed. That reduces the temptation to treat every headline as equally urgent and makes the app more valuable as a regular reading tool.
A second tip is to use the app as one part of a source routine rather than as a replacement for judgment. For a local issue, I might begin here, note the main facts, and then look for official information or another independent report if the decision affects my work, travel, finances, or family. This is not a criticism of Deseret News specifically; it is simply the responsible way I use any single-publication news app.
A third consideration is device age. Because Android 6.0 is the minimum requirement, the application remains approachable for older hardware, but a reader with a very old phone should judge comfort rather than compatibility alone. If pages feel sluggish or text is tiring to read, the problem may be the device’s overall condition. A newer phone, a browser, or a different reading setup could be more pleasant even when the app technically installs.
Who should choose it, and who should skip it
I would recommend Deseret News to someone who already follows the publication, wants a dedicated Android reading option, and prefers a focused source over a noisy collection of headlines. It is also a sensible choice for a reader who checks the same publication regularly and wants a quicker routine than repeatedly navigating through a browser.
I would be more cautious about recommending it to someone who wants a fully personalized news universe. If your priority is combining many publishers, filtering by numerous interests, or comparing coverage side by side, a strong aggregator will probably serve you better. The same is true if you rarely read Deseret News; in that case, the convenience of a separate app may not justify another icon on your device.
I would also skip it as a sole news source if your needs are broad and research-heavy. The app can support a daily reading habit, but it should not be mistaken for a complete substitute for multiple perspectives, specialist publications, official announcements, or direct documents.
Remaining gaps and realistic limitations
The biggest limitation is inherent in the focused model: the app’s usefulness depends on whether its coverage matches what I want to read. A dedicated publication app cannot offer the breadth of a multi-source platform without losing the very focus that makes it attractive. That is a genuine trade-off, not something an interface change can completely solve.
Another possible friction point is expectation. Someone downloading it because the store summary sounds like a broad news service may be disappointed if they wanted a constantly personalized stream of worldwide sources. I see it instead as a digital doorway into Deseret News. That narrower description is less exciting, but it is more accurate and helps set the right expectations.
The app’s free price removes an obvious barrier to trying it, which I value. Still, free access does not mean every reader will prefer its presentation or reading flow. I would test the basic routine before making it central to my news habits, especially if I already have a browser setup that works well.
What I would watch as the product continues
For future updates, I would pay attention to whether the app keeps its directness while improving the details that affect repeated reading: how quickly I can move from a headline to a story, how comfortably articles read on different screens, and whether navigation remains clear as Android changes. Those are the areas that determine whether a news app becomes part of my daily routine or quietly gets ignored.
I would also watch how the product balances publication identity with modern reader expectations. A strong update should preserve the reason to use a dedicated Deseret News app while making it easier for new readers to understand what they are getting. I would welcome thoughtful evolution, but I would not want unnecessary complexity that turns a quick newspaper check into another demanding feed.
After using it as a focused news reader, I see Deseret News as a practical choice for people who specifically want this publication on Android. Its long-running presence, current 5.11.0 build, free entry point, and established audience make it easy to try. My recommendation is straightforward: install it if Deseret News is already part of your reading routine, then compare the app with your current browser habit over several days. If you want one publication delivered in a direct, familiar way, it earns a place on the phone; if you want a broad, highly customizable news hub, another option will likely fit better.
Pros
- Clear focus on Utah and regional news coverage.
- Includes faith
- community
- sports
- and lifestyle content.
- Articles are generally easy to read on mobile devices.
- Useful for readers seeking local perspectives and reporting.
- Provides a convenient digital alternative to the print newspaper.
Cons
- Coverage may feel limited for readers outside Utah.
- Some content or features may require a subscription.
- News selection reflects the publication’s editorial viewpoint.
- App performance and layout may vary after updates.
- Advertising can occasionally distract from reading articles.
FAQ
What is the Deseret News app?
The Deseret News app is a mobile news platform from the Deseret News, offering access to local, national, and international reporting. During testing, its content focused strongly on Utah news, faith and family coverage, politics, sports, business, culture, and opinion. The app is designed for readers who want regularly updated articles in a convenient format rather than relying only on the newspaper’s website.
Is the Deseret News app free to download and use?
The app can generally be downloaded at no cost, allowing users to browse available news and explore its main sections. However, access to all articles or premium content may depend on the publication’s subscription policy, which can change over time. Before downloading, review the current in-app details carefully to understand which stories are free and whether a subscription is required for unlimited access.
What type of news and content does Deseret News provide?
Deseret News covers a broad range of subjects, including Utah and regional reporting, U.S. and world news, politics, sports, business, education, entertainment, lifestyle, and opinion. It also has a distinctive emphasis on family, faith, values, and community issues. This makes it particularly appealing to readers seeking both conventional news reporting and perspective-driven features with a strong connection to Utah.
Does the Deseret News app require an account or subscription?
Some features and articles may be available without creating an account, but an account or paid subscription may be necessary to access the full publication. Subscription requirements can vary depending on the type of content, current promotions, and the user’s location. If you plan to read Deseret News frequently, check the app’s account and subscription screens before committing so you understand pricing, renewal terms, and cancellation options.
Is the Deseret News app worth downloading?
The app is worth considering if you want dependable Utah-focused reporting alongside national news, sports, opinion, and coverage of family or faith-related topics. Its value will depend on your interests and how much content is available without a subscription. Readers who prefer a publication with a clear editorial identity may appreciate it, while users seeking a completely free, broad news aggregator may find the subscription model less suitable.

















