VLC Remote
Android Only$2.99· User Rating
I like media setups that stay out of my way, and VLC Remote is built around exactly that idea. Instead of reaching for a keyboard whenever I want to pause a film, change the volume, or move through a playlist, I can use my phone as a companion controller for VLC Media Player running on a Mac, PC, or Linux computer. It is a focused app rather than a replacement video player, and that distinction matters from the first minute.
Created by Hobbyist Software Ltd, it belongs to the video players and editors category, although its job is more specific than that label suggests. The app does not try to compete with VLC itself. Its purpose is to make a computer-based VLC setup easier to operate from a sofa, bed, meeting room, or any other place where walking back to the computer is inconvenient. After spending time with it, I see the appeal clearly: it turns a familiar desktop media library into something that feels much more comfortable to control.
How the current version fits into a real VLC setup
The current release is version 5.60 (5138), and the app has been available since May 10, 2010. That long history is useful context. This is not a flashy new remote designed around a temporary trend; it is a mature utility that has stayed focused on one relationship: a mobile device controlling VLC on a computer. The application requires Android 7.0 or later, carries an Everyone age rating, and costs $2.99.
That price places it in an interesting position. Many remote-control apps are free, but they often rely on advertising, broad smart-home features, or a confusing collection of controls. Here, I am paying for a narrower tool whose value depends almost entirely on whether I regularly use VLC on a computer. If I do, the one-time purchase can feel reasonable. If I mostly watch through streaming apps, a smart television interface, or a dedicated mobile player, there is little reason to add another controller.
The app has an average rating of 4.5 from around 2.1 thousand ratings, with over 300 written reviews and more than 50 thousand installs. Those figures suggest a small but established audience rather than mass-market reach. That matches my impression: this is for people who have deliberately chosen VLC as part of their media workflow, not for someone looking for a universal remote for every device in the home.
The first setup is the part that needs patience
The most important thing to understand before buying is that the phone and the computer must be able to communicate with VLC. A remote app cannot solve a network arrangement that keeps the devices isolated from one another. If the computer is on one network and the phone is on another, or if a guest network blocks local communication, the experience may appear broken even though the app itself is installed correctly.
I recommend setting it up at home with the computer already running VLC. Keep the phone on the same local network, then work through the app’s connection process rather than assuming it will behave like a Bluetooth remote. This is one of the practical differences between VLC Remote and a television remote: there is usually a little more technical groundwork at the beginning, but the reward is control over a full desktop media player.
That setup requirement also affects where the app works best. It is excellent for a home computer connected to a television, projector, or speakers. It is less convenient for a laptop that frequently changes networks, sleeps aggressively, or is used in places where local-device communication is restricted. I would not treat it as a guaranteed remote for a computer in an office, hotel, or school environment unless I had tested that network first.
What everyday control feels like
Once the connection is working, the basic experience is refreshingly direct. I can start or pause playback, adjust the volume, and move through media without leaving the viewing position. Those actions sound simple, but they remove the small interruptions that make computer-based watching feel less polished than using a television platform.
A realistic example is a weekend film session. I might connect a laptop to a television with a cable, open VLC, and sit several metres away. When someone needs a break, I can pause from the phone instead of searching for the laptop. If the audio is too loud, I can correct it immediately. If I want to revisit a scene, the mobile controller is more convenient than leaning forward to use a trackpad. The app earns its place through these repeated small improvements rather than through a dramatic new feature.
It is also useful for music or long-form audio played through VLC. In that situation, the phone becomes a simple control surface while the computer handles playback and output. I would still prefer a dedicated music application for browsing a large streaming catalogue, but for local files already organized in VLC, a remote can make the computer feel less central to the room.
Why a VLC-specific remote can beat a general remote
General remote apps often try to control presentations, keyboards, media players, and smart-home devices at the same time. That flexibility can be valuable, but it can also make a basic action take several taps. A VLC-focused controller has a clearer purpose. When I open it, I am thinking about playback on VLC, not about switching between unrelated remote modes.
The comparison with a physical wireless keyboard is more balanced. A keyboard gives me text entry, shortcuts, and control over the whole computer. VLC Remote is more comfortable for playback from a distance and avoids keeping a keyboard on the sofa. If I need to rename files, browse folders outside VLC, or troubleshoot the computer, the keyboard wins immediately. I see this app as a companion to a keyboard, not a complete replacement for one.
Compared with a television’s built-in media interface, the trade-off is different. A smart-TV system may be easier for streaming services and remote-friendly browsing, while VLC Remote is better when my files already live on a computer and I want VLC’s broad desktop playback environment. The choice depends less on which interface looks nicer and more on where the media actually resides.
Small workflow choices that make a difference
One useful habit is to prepare the VLC session before sitting down. I prefer opening the intended folder or playlist on the computer first, checking that the correct audio output is selected, and then using the phone for control. This reduces the amount of navigation I expect the remote to handle and keeps the app in its strongest role: operating playback that is already ready to go.
Another practical tip is to treat the phone as a control panel rather than as the media source. I do not expect it to replace VLC’s desktop library management. If I have a large collection, I organize it on the computer and use the remote for selecting, pausing, skipping, or adjusting the session. That separation makes the experience feel faster and avoids trying to perform computer-style file management on a small screen.
I also find it sensible to keep the phone available during playback instead of locking it away immediately. A remote is most valuable when it is within reach. If the phone is buried in a bag or another room, the computer’s keyboard becomes faster. This sounds obvious, but it is the kind of everyday detail that determines whether a remote app becomes part of a routine or gets forgotten.
What the long development history tells me
The release history gives the app a sense of continuity, but I would not confuse age with unlimited compatibility. The current version shows that the project remains maintained in some form, and the numbered release indicates a product that has gone through many iterations. For existing users, that is reassuring: the application has not been abandoned after a brief experiment.
At the same time, the core concept remains deliberately stable. I would not install this expecting a completely redesigned entertainment platform with services, recommendations, or controls for every device in the house. Its evolution is better understood as refinement around the VLC remote-control task. That is a strength for people who value predictability, but it may feel conservative to users who want a modern all-in-one media hub.
For someone upgrading from an earlier installation, the sensible approach is to check the connection after updating rather than assuming every old arrangement will behave identically. Network names, computer settings, VLC configuration, and phone permissions can all affect the result. I would keep the computer-side VLC setup documented, especially if the system is used by several people or connected to a television permanently.
Where the experience still has friction
The biggest weakness is dependence on VLC being available and correctly configured on another computer. This is not a self-contained player. If the computer is switched off, VLC is closed, the network changes, or local communication is blocked, the phone cannot magically provide playback. That extra dependency makes the app less immediate than a native television player or a mobile video app.
There is also a learning curve that does not exist with a traditional infrared remote. A physical remote generally works once batteries are inserted. VLC Remote asks me to think about the relationship between two devices and a desktop application. For a technically comfortable user, that is a short setup task. For a relative who only wants to watch a film, it may be one more system to explain.
Navigation can be another dividing line. A phone screen offers more room for labels and lists than a tiny physical remote, but it is still not the same as browsing a large library on a television-sized interface. I would be happy using it to control a prepared queue. I would be less enthusiastic about handing it to someone who needs to explore thousands of files without knowing where they are stored.
The app is also not the right purchase for people who want a universal controller. If the main goal is to operate a smart television, streaming box, presentation software, and computer from one app, a broader remote may provide better value. VLC Remote’s specialization is precisely what makes it clean for VLC, but that specialization limits its usefulness outside that environment.
Who will get the most from it
I would recommend it to anyone who regularly connects a computer to a television or sound system and uses VLC for local media. It is especially suitable when the computer is stationary, the network is stable, and the viewer wants basic playback control from a comfortable distance. It can also help in classrooms, small presentation spaces, or shared rooms where walking to the computer repeatedly is disruptive, provided the local network permits the connection.
It is a good fit for a household that already trusts VLC and does not want to rebuild its media collection inside another platform. The app preserves the computer as the main library and adds a more relaxed way to operate it. That is a practical upgrade without forcing a change in how files are stored or played.
I would suggest skipping it if most of your viewing happens on a phone, tablet, streaming stick, or smart-TV application. I would also skip it if you need remote access over the internet rather than control within the same local environment. The product makes most sense when the phone and VLC computer are close enough to work as a pair.
Questions I would answer before installing
If you are wondering whether the $2.99 purchase replaces VLC, it does not. Think of it as an accessory for VLC Media Player on a Mac, PC, or Linux computer. You still need the desktop player and a usable connection between the devices. The app’s value comes from convenience, not from supplying a separate playback engine.
If you are asking whether it is useful without a television, the answer is yes, but the benefit is smaller. Controlling a computer from another chair, a desk across the room, or beside a bed can still be convenient. However, the strongest scenario is a computer whose screen or audio output is being enjoyed from a distance.
If connection problems appear, I would first check the basics: both devices should be on the same local network, VLC should be running, and the computer should not be asleep. I would then review the app’s connection details and any network isolation settings. Restarting everything can help, but understanding the local-network requirement is more valuable than repeatedly reinstalling the app.
If you need text entry or full computer control, keep a keyboard or another remote nearby. VLC Remote is excellent for playback actions, but it is not designed to turn a phone into a complete desktop input device. Knowing that boundary prevents disappointment and makes it easier to use the app alongside the right tool.
What I would watch in future updates
Because the current version is already a mature release, I would pay attention to improvements that reduce setup friction and preserve dependable connections across changing home networks. Those changes would matter more to me than decorative interface updates. A remote succeeds when it connects quickly and responds when I need it.
I would also value continued attention to existing VLC workflows: playlists, local libraries, long viewing sessions, and mixed audio or video collections. The app does not need to become a universal entertainment platform to remain useful. Its best future is one that makes the focused job more reliable without burying simple playback controls under unnecessary extras.
My final view is positive but specific. VLC Remote is a worthwhile companion when VLC on a computer is already central to the way you watch or listen. It turns an awkward sofa-to-laptop routine into something much more natural, and its focused design is preferable to a cluttered universal remote in that situation. The price is easy to justify for regular VLC users, while the Everyone rating makes it approachable for a broad household audience.
I would not recommend it as a general-purpose remote or as a replacement for a smart-TV interface. Its success depends on a stable local connection, a running VLC computer, and a media library you already manage there. For the right setup, though, it solves a real everyday annoyance with very little fuss after the initial configuration. That is why I would recommend it to a friend who watches local media through VLC, while steering everyone else toward a more suitable remote or native playback option.
Pros
- Controls VLC playback from anywhere on the same Wi‑Fi network.
- Offers convenient play
- pause
- volume
- and seek controls.
- Displays media information and playback progress on your phone.
- Supports queue management without interrupting the current video.
- Useful for home theater setups when the computer is out of reach.
Cons
- Requires VLC to be running and correctly configured on the computer.
- Remote access may fail if firewall or network settings block the connection.
- Works best on the same local network; remote internet control is limited.
- Some advanced VLC features are unavailable through the mobile interface.
- The app’s usefulness depends entirely on having a separate VLC installation.
FAQ
What is VLC Remote and what can it do?
VLC Remote is a companion app that lets you control VLC Media Player running on a computer or compatible device from an Android or iOS phone. After connecting both devices to the same network, you can pause, play, stop, seek through a video, adjust the volume, change tracks, browse media, and manage playlists without returning to your desk. It is especially useful when VLC is connected to a television or projector.
How do I connect VLC Remote to VLC Media Player?
To use VLC Remote, install the app on your mobile device and make sure VLC Media Player is installed and running on the computer you want to control. Both devices generally need to be connected to the same Wi-Fi network. Depending on the version, you may need to enable VLC’s remote-control interface or use an included setup assistant. The app usually provides connection instructions, but firewall settings can sometimes require additional configuration.
Does VLC Remote work without an internet connection?
VLC Remote normally does not require an active internet connection after installation. It communicates with VLC over your local network, so your phone and computer can control each other through the same Wi-Fi router even when the internet is unavailable. However, the initial download, updates, and some optional online features may require internet access. If the connection fails, check that both devices are on the same network and that VLC is allowed through the computer’s firewall.
Is VLC Remote free to use, and are there any limitations?
VLC Remote may be available in free and paid versions, depending on the platform and publisher. The basic functions usually include playback controls, volume adjustment, seeking, and track selection, while premium features can vary by version. Before downloading, review the current store listing for advertising, in-app purchases, supported operating systems, and feature differences. The app controls VLC; it is not a replacement for VLC Media Player itself.
Is VLC Remote safe and compatible with my device?
VLC Remote is generally designed as a lightweight companion utility, but compatibility depends on the app version, your Android or iOS release, and the VLC installation on your computer. Download it only from a trusted official app store or the developer’s verified source. Because it connects to VLC over your local network, avoid using it on untrusted public Wi-Fi. Keep both the app and VLC updated, and review requested permissions before completing installation.

















