This Old House
Android OnlyFree· User Rating
I spent time with This Old House as a home-improvement companion, and the part that stood out most was its ability to turn a broad renovation question into something easier to explore. Instead of opening it with a precise product already in mind, I found myself using it as a starting point: a place to gather ideas, understand a repair topic, and decide what I could reasonably investigate before reaching for tools or calling a professional.
That makes it different from a simple shopping app or a narrow calculator. This is a House & Home app from This Old House, the developer behind the familiar home-improvement brand. Its store summary presents it as America’s Favorite Home Improvement Brand, but my experience was less about branding and more about how useful a trusted editorial starting point can be when a house problem is still vague.
The app is free to install and suitable for Everyone, which makes it approachable for a household where different people may use it for different reasons. It has a 3.8 average from around 220 ratings and more than 10 thousand installs, so it is not the most widely used home tool on the platform. Still, those figures suggest a modest audience rather than a reason to dismiss it. I would judge it mainly by whether its guidance fits the way I actually plan and research home projects.
How the app turns home-improvement research into a practical first step
The central capability: making a project easier to frame
The strongest capability here is not a single advanced instrument or a replacement for a contractor. It is the way the app helps me frame a project before I commit money, time, or effort. “My bathroom needs work” is too broad to act on. A more useful question is whether I am researching storage, surfaces, lighting, ventilation, layout, or a repair. A home-improvement app becomes valuable when it helps move me from that first vague thought toward a more specific next step.
I see this as the main reason to keep it on a phone. The app is most helpful at the beginning of a decision, when I need ideas and context rather than a final shopping cart. It can help me compare possible directions mentally, notice details I might otherwise overlook, and build a short list of questions for a later conversation with a tradesperson or retailer.
That role matters because many home mistakes happen before the work begins. People often choose a finish before thinking about moisture, maintenance, access, or how the change will affect adjacent rooms. A broad editorial resource cannot solve every technical issue, but it can encourage a more deliberate planning process. I found that more useful than a stream of disconnected inspiration images.
The app also benefits from being associated with This Old House rather than presenting itself as an anonymous collection of tips. That does not mean every suggestion should be accepted without checking the details of my own home. It does mean the experience feels oriented toward real houses and real decisions, not only toward making a room look attractive in a picture.
What using it feels like in practice
My practical workflow would be to open it before searching randomly on the web. I would begin with the room or problem that is bothering me, read enough to understand the available approaches, and then write down the parts that require measurements, local code knowledge, or professional inspection. That order is important. It prevents the common habit of jumping straight from a glossy idea to a purchase.
For example, imagine I notice that a hallway feels dark and cramped. I would not use this app as proof that a particular wall can be removed or that a certain electrical change is safe. I would use it to explore the design problem, identify possible improvements, and learn which questions deserve a more authoritative answer. The result is a better conversation with a contractor because I can describe the goal instead of merely saying that I want the space to feel nicer.
A second useful workflow is to use the app while walking through the house. I can note several small issues rather than treating each one as an emergency: a draft near a window, worn trim, poor storage, or a room that needs better lighting. Later, the app can help me sort those observations into cosmetic updates, maintenance tasks, and jobs that may need specialist attention. That sorting is a concrete benefit that a generic image board does not provide.
I would also keep a skeptical habit while reading. Home advice often depends on the age of the building, the materials already present, climate, and local rules. The app is a research companion, not a substitute for checking those conditions. Its value increases when I use it to ask better questions, not when I treat every general explanation as a universal instruction.
A realistic weekend example
Suppose I am preparing for a weekend refresh of a small entryway. I might first use the app to think through the purpose of the space: easier cleaning, more storage, better lighting, or simply a more welcoming appearance. Those goals lead to different choices. If I only chase appearance, I might overlook muddy shoes, narrow circulation, or the need to keep a door and radiator clear.
After narrowing the goal, I would make a simple list of what I need to verify at home. I would measure the available wall, check where doors swing, photograph existing trim, and note the surfaces that will receive paint or hardware. Then I could return to the app for ideas that fit those constraints. This is where the experience becomes more useful than passive browsing: the house supplies the limits, and the app helps shape the options.
Before buying anything, I would separate inspiration from commitment. A color or storage concept may look right in an article but behave differently under my lighting or with my existing flooring. I would also distinguish an easy weekend task from work involving wiring, plumbing, structural changes, or hazardous materials. The app can help me prepare, but that boundary keeps the project realistic.
For a small job, this process may seem overly careful. In practice, it can save a trip to the store and prevent buying materials that do not suit the room. For a larger renovation, the same process is even more valuable because early assumptions become expensive once demolition or installation starts.
Where it fits beside familiar alternatives
The usual alternative is a general web search. That option is faster when I need one exact answer, such as a product specification or a local service. It is also better when I already know the technical question. The drawback is that search results can mix professional guidance, personal anecdotes, retailer content, and outdated advice. This Old House gives me a more focused starting environment for home topics.
Another alternative is a video platform. Videos can be excellent when I need to see a technique, understand tool handling, or follow a sequence visually. They can also make difficult work look deceptively simple. I prefer using the app first for orientation, then choosing video or professional help once I understand the scope. That combination reduces the chance that I imitate a project without noticing the conditions that made it safe in the original example.
Social inspiration platforms are stronger for discovering styles and seeing how real people finish a room. They are weaker at explaining why one approach may be suitable and another may create maintenance problems. This app is not my first choice for collecting endless visual references, but it is more useful when I want the idea connected to a home-improvement decision.
Dedicated project-planning tools can be better for budgets, measurements, checklists, or renovation schedules. I would choose one of those when a project has already moved into execution. This Old House makes more sense before that stage, when I am deciding what the project should be and what information I still need.
The tradeoffs I noticed
The broad editorial approach is both the app’s strength and its limitation. It can help me explore a subject, but it does not turn my phone into a complete project-management system. I should not expect the same depth of estimating, inventory control, measurement tools, or contractor coordination that a specialized app may offer.
There is also a difference between being inspired and being ready. Reading about a repair or redesign can make a project feel approachable, but the actual work may involve awkward access, hidden damage, specialist tools, or rules that vary by location. I would be especially cautious with electrical, gas, structural, roofing, and water-related work. The app is useful for preparing questions; it is not a reason to skip qualified help.
The free entry point is appealing, although the app includes in-app purchases ranging from around ten dollars to nearly ninety-six dollars per item. That makes it important to understand what I am receiving before paying for anything. I would begin with the free experience and only consider an optional purchase if it clearly improves a project I am actively planning. Someone looking for a completely cost-free toolset should keep that possibility in mind.
The current version is 2.0.500016 - P.bd4a77f7d, and the app requires Android 6.0 or later. That is a reasonable compatibility range for many Android phones, but I would still check the device before planning to rely on it during a project. A phone that is old, low on storage, or awkward to use around dust and water is not an ideal worksite companion, regardless of the app.
The rating also tells me to keep expectations measured. A 3.8 average is neither a warning to avoid it nor proof that it will suit everyone. With around 107 written reviews, there is enough user feedback to suggest a mixed experience rather than universal approval. I would treat it as a useful resource whose value depends on whether I want guided home-improvement research or a more specialized utility.
Who gets the most from it
I would recommend it most to a new homeowner, a renter planning permitted cosmetic changes, or anyone who has a list of home problems but does not know where to begin. It is also a good fit for a person who prefers learning the reasoning behind a project before buying supplies. The app can help turn “I should fix this someday” into a clearer set of decisions.
It may also suit experienced DIY users during the idea stage. Someone who already knows how to complete a task does not need basic encouragement, but may still appreciate a different way to think about layout, materials, or the order of improvements. I would use it as a source of perspective rather than as my only technical reference.
I would skip it if my immediate need is a precise calculator, a materials database, a contractor marketplace, or a step-by-step tool that tracks every stage of a renovation. A specialist app will be better in those situations. I would also skip relying on it alone for urgent damage or safety-sensitive repairs, where an inspection and direct professional advice matter more than general reading.
For me, the best habit is to use it in three passes. First, explore the problem without shopping. Second, inspect the actual room and record constraints. Third, return to the relevant guidance and decide whether the next step is a small task, more research, or a professional consultation. That workflow is a non-obvious advantage because it keeps the app from becoming another source of impulsive project ideas.
My recommendation after using it
This Old House works best as a thoughtful front door into home improvement. Its real effect is not that it completes a renovation for me; it helps make the first decision less intimidating and more structured. I can start with a room, a repair concern, or a vague wish for change, then move toward practical questions instead of immediately buying products.
I like that the experience can support both small household updates and the early planning of larger work. I also like that it encourages a slower approach than scrolling through isolated tips. The limitations are clear: it is not a full project-management suite, not a guarantee that a technique applies to my property, and not a replacement for skilled help when safety or building requirements are involved.
Because it is free to start and rated for Everyone, I think it is worth trying for homeowners and curious renters who want a dependable place to begin. I would keep my expectations realistic about optional purchases and technical depth. If I needed one focused utility, I would choose something more specialized. If I needed help deciding what my home-improvement question actually is, this app would be a sensible companion.
Pros
- Practical renovation advice from trusted home-improvement experts
- Clear step-by-step guidance suits beginners and experienced DIY users
- Helpful videos demonstrate tools
- techniques
- and project processes
- Covers repairs
- remodeling
- landscaping
- and home maintenance topics
- Useful inspiration for planning upgrades and improving older homes
Cons
- Some projects require specialized tools or advanced DIY experience
- Material and labor costs can vary significantly by location
- Older content may not reflect the latest products or building standards
- Video-heavy content may use considerable mobile data
- Certain advice may be less relevant to renters or apartment residents
FAQ
What is This Old House, and what can I use it for?
This Old House is a home-improvement resource focused on renovation, maintenance, repairs, landscaping, and practical DIY advice. It typically provides access to project guides, expert tips, instructional videos, product information, and inspiration for different areas of a home. It is useful for beginners planning small fixes as well as experienced homeowners researching larger remodeling projects.
Is This Old House suitable for beginners without renovation experience?
Yes, much of the content is written to be approachable for homeowners who are learning as they go. Instructions often explain tools, materials, preparation, and basic techniques before moving into the project itself. However, difficulty varies considerably. Beginners should start with simpler maintenance tasks, read the full instructions carefully, and avoid electrical, structural, gas, or major plumbing work unless they have the required knowledge or professional assistance.
Does This Old House provide complete instructions for every home-improvement project?
The platform offers detailed guidance for many common projects, but the amount of information can differ from one article or video to another. Some guides include step-by-step directions, shopping lists, estimated costs, and safety recommendations, while others are mainly intended as general inspiration. Before starting, compare the advice with local building codes, manufacturer instructions, and the specific conditions of your home.
Can I trust the costs, tools, and product recommendations shown in This Old House content?
The recommendations are helpful as a starting point, especially when you need to understand which tools or materials a project may require. Nevertheless, prices, product availability, labor rates, and local requirements change frequently. Treat cost estimates as approximate rather than guaranteed, and verify specifications before purchasing. It is also wise to compare several products and confirm that they are compatible with your existing systems.
Is This Old House free to use, and are there any limitations?
Much of the This Old House website and its publicly available educational content can generally be accessed without paying, although availability may depend on the platform, region, or distribution service. Some videos or features may require an account, a participating streaming service, or may include advertising. Before downloading or subscribing, review the current store listing, privacy information, and any in-app or third-party payment terms.

















